<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Curious Little Person</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com</link>
	<description>Blogging Personified</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:14:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Faces Antitrust Review For Its Search Results</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/google-faces-antitrust-review-for-its-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/google-faces-antitrust-review-for-its-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google methods for internet searches and ranking for websites has come under the scanner. They are being scrutinized by the Texas Attorney General which is closely looking at the core business of the company]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-231" href="http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/google-faces-antitrust-review-for-its-search-results/google/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-231" title="Google" src="http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Google-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="169" height="150" /></a>Google methods for internet searches and ranking for websites has come under the scanner. They are being scrutinized by the Texas Attorney General which is closely looking at the core business of the company.</p>
<p>This allegation comes from small companies that they are not fairly ranked by Google when their names comes up in Internet Search</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s deputy general counsel confirmed that they&#8217;ve been approached by Texas Attorney General for further investigation. They also Asserted that the company’s success is by “building great products” and not by locking in its users or advertisers, he said that as Google grows, “we’re going to face more questions about how our business works“.</p>
<p>The Antitrust review will be interesting to follow as it will reveal if  Google actually manipulates their search results for more business. Hopefully, Google is asked to reveal the factors on which they rank websites as it might just change the face of the Search Engine Optimization industry and leave the SEO experts in a lurch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/google-faces-antitrust-review-for-its-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype &amp; Google Could be Next on India&#8217;s Watch List</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/skype-google-could-be-next-on-indias-watch-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/skype-google-could-be-next-on-indias-watch-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only a few hours after RIM managed to avoid the Indian ban hammer, it now looks like Google and Skype could be the next target.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a few hours after RIM managed to avoid the <a href="http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/blackberry-agrees-to-monitoring-of-services-in-india/">Indian ban hammer</a>, it now looks like Google and Skype could be the next target. India’s Home Ministry, the country’s interior ministry (think police force and other domestic policy matters), has told the BBC that “any company with a telecoms network should be accessible” to the country’s security services. India says it needs to be able to be able to tap into such communications in order to thwart potential terrorism threats. Since Google’s Gmail uses encryption, and Skype is a proprietary protocol, the Indian government would have no way to tap into them should the need arise.</p>
<p>It’s the exact same situation that RIM had been facing, so we could be looking at a case where India is merely “working its way down the to-do list.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/skype-google-could-be-next-on-indias-watch-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reditt Beats Digg At It&#8217;s Own Game</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/reditt-beats-digg-at-its-own-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/reditt-beats-digg-at-its-own-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digg recently launched its long-awaited redesign, making the site much more appealing to publishers, as it is now easier to push content out to Digg users. Some Digg users apparently aren't as thrilled about it. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg recently launched its long-awaited redesign, making the site much more appealing to publishers, as it is now easier to push content out to Digg users. Some Digg users apparently aren&#8217;t as thrilled about it.</p>
<p>The new Digg site has essentially turned into nothing more than a glorified RSS dump for sites. In case you’ve missed the news, the biggest problem behind the new version is that it allows sites to push their RSS feeds directly into their timeline, which can cause the overall quality of front-page posts to diminish.</p>
<p><img src="http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/files/2010/08/doodle7.png" alt="" width="373" height="547" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious that Reddit has its Digg account set up to auto-publish any Reddit stories from its RSS feeds (a luxury afforded to any publisher). Publishers who are getting their content shared on Reddit are benefiting doubly.</p>
<p>Previously, it was harder to game Digg because a user would have to submit a link and then the link would have to be up voted by the population. However, due to the random nature of Reddit’s readership, it’s now quite easy to sway the entire front page as all articles are submitted regardless of how good, bad or indifferent.</p>
<p>Clearly, Digg is going to have to do something about the situation. It&#8217;s very doubtful that they&#8217;re going to let Reddit dominate the entire Top News section for long, particularly as the site is trying to reinvent itself, and spark a renewed interest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/reditt-beats-digg-at-its-own-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry Agrees To Monitoring of Services In India</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/blackberry-agrees-to-monitoring-of-services-in-india/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/blackberry-agrees-to-monitoring-of-services-in-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a big respite to all Blackberry users in India, BlackBerry mobile phone maker Research In Motion (RIM) today gave in promising access to Indian security agencies to monitor all its services with immediate effect. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In a big respite to all Blackberry users in India, BlackBerry mobile phone maker Research In Motion (RIM) today gave in promising access to Indian security agencies to monitor all its services with immediate effect.</div>
<p>The government, meanwhile, says it won&#8217;t ban BlackBerry services for at least 60 days, easing up on the threat leveled over access to encrypted data.</p>
<p>The Ministry of Home Affairs says it will &#8220;review the situation in 60 days&#8221;, after telecom authorities examine Research In Motion&#8217;s proposals to give security agencies greater access to corporate e-mail and instant messaging.</p>
<p>RIM is facing widespread concern over its strong data encryption, which is beloved by corporate customers eager to guard secrets but troublesome for some governments in the Middle East and Asia, which worry it could be used by militants to avoid detection.</p>
<p>Nearly two months after insisting that it does not have the provision to grant access for such monitoring, RIM made certain proposals for lawful access of BlackBerry Enterprise Services (BES) and BlackBerry Messenger Services (BBM) by the law enforcement agencies.</p>
<p>RIM&#8217;s response came after the Indian Home Ministry made it clear that Blackberry has to shut down its operations in the country from 1st September  if it failed to provide access to monitoring of its messenger services.</p>
<p>The Ministry has made it clear that any communication through the telecom networks should be accessible to the law enforcement agencies and all telecom service providers including third-parties have to comply with this, it said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/blackberry-agrees-to-monitoring-of-services-in-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are People Searching Less Than They Were A Year Ago</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/why-are-people-searching-less-than-they-were-a-year-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/why-are-people-searching-less-than-they-were-a-year-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen released its version of the U.S. search market rankings for July this week. Google is of course on top with 3 out of 5 searches (64.2%). Yahoo came in second with 14.3%, leaving Microsoft in third at 13.6%. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen released its version of the U.S. search market rankings for July this week. Google is of course on top with 3 out of 5 searches (64.2%). Yahoo came in second with 14.3%, leaving Microsoft in third at 13.6%.</p>
<p>Yahoo and Microsoft both gained in month-over-month share (2% and 4%, respectively). This is all good for Microsoft, as Bing has now completely overtaken Yahoo&#8217;s organic results in the U.S. and Canada.</p>
<p>&#8220;In terms of a Year-on-Year comparison there has been little change in Google&#8217;s share but more significant movement amongst its closest competitors,&#8221; <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-search-sites-for-july-2010/">says</a> Nielsen. &#8220;MSN/Windows Live/Bing’s share has grown from 9.0% to 13.6% (a delta increase of 4.6% or a relative increase of 51%) while Yahoo!’s share has fallen from 17.1% to 14.3% (a delta drop of 2.8% or a relative drop of 17%). Consequently, over the last year Yahoo!’s delta lead over MSN/Windows Live/Bing has been reduced from 7.1% to only 0.7%.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft account for more than 9 out of 10 searches (92.1%).</p>
<p>The total number of searches in the U.S. over the last year has gone down by 16% from 10.5 billion to 8.8 billion. This is a very interesting stat. I wonder how much of this has to do with increased use of smartphones and mobile apps or mainly due to internet filled with all sorts of websites that contain good and valid content in large numbers. People are starting too bookmark these websites and search on them directly instead of going through search engines.</p>
<div>
<p>I guess people visit those specific websites that return better and more specific answers than general search engines. Your thoughts on this ?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/why-are-people-searching-less-than-they-were-a-year-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google SEO Ranking Factors</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/google-seo-ranking-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/google-seo-ranking-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ranking factors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ranking formula for Google’s main search function looks for the keywords in the visible body text, header tags, title tags and hypertext links. Google gives a very heavy weighting to the link popularity, with extra points for quality of links and relevancy of text around the links.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The ranking formula for Google’s main search function looks for the keywords in the visible body text, header tags, title tags and hypertext links. Google gives a very heavy weighting to the link popularity, with extra points for quality of links and relevancy of text around the links. Google also has miscellaneous points available for such things as:</div>
<p> </p>
<div>• <strong>Age of domain/site</strong>—The longer your domain name has been registered, the more likely you are serious about being online for the long term.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>• <strong>File size</strong>—Try not to exceed 100k. A recent study found that the body section of your site ranks best between 50 and 70k in size. More than 100k in size might not be cached unless it is considered exceptional content. </div>
<p>• <strong>Freshness of content</strong>—Google is always looking for sites that are updated on a regular basis. The more frequent you update your site, the more frequent Google’s spiders will visit your site. </p>
<p>• <strong>Links from directories</strong>—Google awards points if directories such as Yahoo!, Looksmart, DMOZ, and About provide a link to your site. </p>
<p>Most of the search engines are giving heavy weighting to link popularity— that is, the number of links to your site from other sites on the Internet. The search engines are getting very sophisticated in the weighting of link popularity, with the search engines giving extra points for link relevancy—that is, how high the site with the link to your site would rank for the same keyword. Other points are awarded based on the keywords in the text around the link pointing to your Web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/google-seo-ranking-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Link Velocity?</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/what-is-link-velocity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/what-is-link-velocity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link velocity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Link velocity and is most apparent with new websites. Site owners go mad building links through press releases, campaigns etc that bring them in a quick amount of links]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;"><img class="alignright" title="Link Building" src="http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Link Building.JPG" alt="" width="189" height="105" />Also called link acquisition, link velocity is something that you need to be aware of and it forms part of having a natural link profile.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Link velocity and is most apparent with new websites. Site owners go mad building links through press releases, campaigns etc that bring them in a quick amount of links. However, that volume of links quickly peaks, and then just as quickly as it grows, it falls back down to its &#8220;natural&#8221; level, which is usually virtually no new links being grown naturally.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span id="more-192"></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">This is something you need to be aware of, as an extreme growth and fall pattern can lead to you being scrutinised and possibly penalized if the search engine finds you have been building lots of those links manually. In other words, as the links drop off, the buildup of momentum to the site drops. As this momentum drops, so your pages will steadily rank lower and lower.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">This partly explains why people talk of Google having a &#8220;sandbox&#8221; for new sites, where there is an initial spurt up the SERP&#8217;s, and then rather than staying there, their site drops like a stone despite having lots of links to the site, before eventually settling in its &#8220;natural&#8221; position.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">So when you build your links, plan for continual growth. Build by varied means, continually and at a similar rate each day/week/month. Take things to the next level only as your site grows in stature and can sustain a permanent &#8220;jump&#8221; in the SERP&#8217;s as it grows in authority and trust with the search engine.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/what-is-link-velocity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Top Tips for Your Blogs Success</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/5-top-tips-for-your-blogs-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/5-top-tips-for-your-blogs-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A blogs success depends on various factors. Based on my experience, I&#8217;m listing a few: 1. Find a great niche and create great content - This is the foundation towards your blogs success. Make sure that you  give your users good reasons to come back and to bookmark, tag, and link to your site. If you do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;">A blogs success depends on various factors. Based on my experience, I&#8217;m listing a few:</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>1. Find a great niche and create great content -</strong> This is the foundation towards your blogs success. Make sure that you  give your users good reasons to come back and to bookmark, tag, and link to your site. If you do only this and nothing else, your site will rank well without any specific optimization activity.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span id="more-186"></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>2. Lay the right foundations - </strong> This is a very crucial factor to your blogs success. Make sure you  host your site with a fast and flexible provider, and structure the site symmetrically and with a logical domain name, directory structure, and filenames.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>3.</strong> <strong>Do everything you can with the assets under your control &#8211; </strong>In terms of on-page SEO, but realize that this only gets you to the start line in the race for decent rankings. SEO is not simply an exercise in decent copywriting, but a continuous process.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>4. Spend more time on directory submissions and article writing for E-Zines &#8211; </strong> Provide a reason for visitors to come back to your blog. Your site must be newsworthy, funny, or controversial, or at the very least full of great resources. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>5. Target long tail keywords -</strong>  A decent organic search campaign will take your blog a long way. Save money by targeting long-tail terms, tuning match drivers, and crafting decent landing pages.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Feel free to add-on to the list, as this is what came to my mind at this point in time.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/5-top-tips-for-your-blogs-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebHosting Geeks &#8211; An Excellent Web Hosting Review Resource</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/webhosting-geeks-an-excellent-web-hosting-review-resource/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/webhosting-geeks-an-excellent-web-hosting-review-resource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dedicated hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At times it does get difficult deciding among the various web site hosting plans that are available in the virtual world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;">The importance of a having a good host can never be ignored if you&#8217;re looking at making your internet career a <img class="alignright" title="web host" src="http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/web host.jpg" alt="" width="307" height="190" />success. In the Internet world it could be said, that your hosting provider could either make you or break you. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">At times it does get difficult deciding among the various <a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">web site hosting</span></a><span style="color: #000000;"> plans that are available in the virtual world. To help you sort out your problems on deciding which host to opt for, Webhosting Geeks provides you frank and honest reviews of the different web hosts available in the market. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span id="more-172"></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;">Most hosts tend to make huge claims that they&#8217;re hosting is the best in the market. However, you must remember that each host will have their own pros and cons. Generally most hosts will provide you with a free domain once you sign up for their domain hosting plan. You should also be aware of various hosting scams that tend to have a huge online presence. To combat all the negative effects, you have Webhosting Geeks that provide you reviews by users about various </span><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/multipledomainhosting.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">domain hosting</span></a><span style="color: #000000;"> plans.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">There are different kind of hosting plans that you can opt for which would depend on your requirement. The two most widely known types of hosting plans are shared hosting and dedicated hosting. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;">Shared hosting is a plan where a server is shared among different users. Here you will end up sharing bandwidth and disk space etc among different users.  This is generally a low-cost solution and is good when you&#8217;re just starting up.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/dedicatedserverhosting.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Dedicated hosting</span></a></span><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/dedicatedserverhosting.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;"> </span></a><span style="color: #000000;">is a more costly and private affair. The server belongs to you which means you have more bandwidth and more space. Here you end up owning the server and it&#8217;s up to you to decide on the  technical details of the server. This is a good solution if you&#8217;re more experienced and your website attracts a lot of traffic.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">In conclusion, it&#8217;s up to you to decide which hosting plan to opt for based on your requirements. However, it does help to get good advice on which host to select. Webhosting Geeks is an excellent review website that provides you accurate reviews of the different web hosts available in the market. </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/webhosting-geeks-an-excellent-web-hosting-review-resource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How My Big Blogging Failure Became an Accidental Success</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/how-my-big-blogging-failure-became-an-accidental-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/how-my-big-blogging-failure-became-an-accidental-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is an inspirational one. Talks about how this guy turned the leaf over by utilizing his blog&#8217;s experience &#8211; which he thought was a failure into a complete success..   Take aways from the Post&#8230; Blogging is not a way to get rich quick. For every A-lister, there are literally thousands of other bloggers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-169 alignright" title="inspiration" src="http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/inspiration.jpg" alt="inspiration" width="389" height="151" />This post is an inspirational one. Talks about how this guy turned the leaf over by utilizing his blog&#8217;s experience &#8211; which he thought was a failure into a complete success..</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span id="more-168"></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Take aways from the Post&#8230;</span></strong></p>
<p>Blogging is <em>not</em> a way to get rich quick. For every A-lister, there are literally thousands of other bloggers working hard and not making very much money at all.</p>
<p>Don’t get too fixed on <em>one</em> way of getting income from blogging. You might find that affiliate reviews work for you, not advertising &#8211; or you might freelance, like I did.</p>
<p>If your first attempt at blogging doesn’t work out, don’t worry. It took me a while to find my voice and figure out what I <em>really </em>wanted to write about.</p>
<p>Conversely, don’t keep starting and quitting blogs: tell yourself that you’ll give it at least a year.</p>
<p>You can read the complete post <a href="http://www.maxblogpress.com/maxblogger/644/big-blogging-failure-accidental/" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curiouslittleperson.com/how-my-big-blogging-failure-became-an-accidental-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
